SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > News > Story

Published - Wednesday, September 17, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (8 comment(s))

Holmen committee sets wording for Nov. 4 fluoride referendum

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
Holmen residents will get a say on whether fluoride should be in the water supply come Election Day.

Tuesday, the Holmen Village Board’s Finance and Personnel Committee approved wording for a referendum that will be on the Nov. 4 ballot.

The question will read: “Are you in favor of implementing the fluoridation of the village of Holmen water supply? Estimated initial capital improvement cost $138,000. Estimated annual operation cost $29,000. Yes or no.”

The measure will be binding.

Holmen has La Crosse county’s only public water system without a therapeutic level of fluoride. In fact, Holmen is the largest community in the state without fluoridated water.

A push for fluoridation in the village came out of a dental care advisory council formed in 2005 by the area’s three legislators.

Fluoridation has been hailed by the Centers for Disease Control as “one of the 10 great public-health achievements of the 20th century.” Since first being introduced in 1945 in Grand Rapids, Mich., fluoridation has grown to be included in the vast majority of public water systems. Fluoridated water is now supplied to 170 million Americans.

Those who oppose fluoride view it as a poison that can cause a range of health problems, and they argue that adding it to the drinking water to prevent dental decay in a minority of people with inadequate dental hygiene is philosophically akin to adding asthma medication to the air to treat the small minority of asthmatic people or putting appetite suppressants in the water to address the obesity epidemic.

Village trustees say they want to stay clear of the arguments, simply presenting facts related to costs involved. Members of the Finance and Personnel Committee, charged with wording the referendum, agreed that people should know the cost involved. “It is proper to tell voters what it will cost,” Trustee Mark Seitz said.

“Both sides have their pros and cons but what impacts the village is what it will cost,” Administrator/Clerk Catherine Schmit added.

The full village board was to discuss the referendum at its monthly meeting Thursday night, after this newspaper’s deadline.

  • LINK: Push to fluoridate Holmen's water could renew debate about practice (January 2006)
    .
  •    Advertisement   
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »

    Anita wrote on Sep 20, 2008 10:00 PM:

    " What a waste of our taxpayers money that government research documents that note many health problems with fluoridation.
    See online:
    See pages 112, 125, 128, and 129. References are important also.

    The first Toxicological Profile for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine (F) was published by ATSDR in April 1993. Report No. ATSDR/TP-91/17.
    ATSDR was mandated by the US Congress in 1987 to prepare toxicological profiles for hazardous substances at Superfund sites (on the National Priorities List) "that pose the most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by ATSDR and EPA." Currently there are 275 hazardous substances in this category. In 1987, 150 hazardous substances were identified, and fluoride was included in that list.

    See also:

    See pages 5, 11, 16, 30, 34(color pix of dental fluorosis), 41, 44-45 (cavities form in these weakened teeth), 128, and 129 (notes calcium in high dietary levels can form insoluble complexes with fluorides, making it unabsorbable from the gastrointestinal tract.)
    and we all know calcium is the one element needed for strong teeth and bones!

    National Academy Press - Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride
    - 2 visits - 10:17pm Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride (1993) Commission on Life Sciences (CLS) ... Dr. Frank Press is president of the National Academy of Sciences. ...
    www.nap.edu/books/030904975X/html/ - 38k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this

    *************
    But this one is even more important!!


    1: Neurotoxicology. 2007 Sep;28(5):1023-31. Epub 2007 Jun 30. Compound (MeSH Keyword), Substance (MeSH Keyword), LinkOut
    Effects of fluoridation and disinfection agent combinations on lead leaching from leaded-brass parts.
    Maas RP, Patch SC, Christian AM, Coplan MJ.
    Environmental Quality Institute, The University of North Carolina-Asheville, One University Heights, Asheville, NC 28804, United States. "

    nyscof wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:15 AM:

    " Take action to end fluoridation here:

    http://congress.FluorideAction.Net "

    million wrote on Sep 16, 2008 8:01 AM:

    " People with fluoridated water in this country ... no wonder we voted Bush in twice! It is poison and its making us crazy. "

    Jim Jim Jim wrote on Sep 16, 2008 6:09 AM:

    " Not here too! You already dominated this topic on the Holmen Courier site with the majority of posts being by you and many as much as 560 word each. Again, I believe you! I am and always will be against mass medication of the public. "

    Why do they bother with a vote wrote on Sep 12, 2008 2:06 PM:

    " In this area the ignorant always win. Reject it, you've all been fine for years ... there is no sense in trying to actually improve dental health. It is all a big government conspiracy to enrich dentists. Those people at the CDC, why, they are evil people bent on poisoning all of us! They haven't the soul to admit a mistake ... they want you to DIE! "

    Jim Schultz wrote on Sep 11, 2008 8:30 PM:

    " fluoridation is not typical but in a few countries. Most of the world rejects this foolish idea and reduced cavities as much or more without damaging half the kids teeth with fluoride toxicity causing dental fluorosis. Pizzo 2007 the most recent review shows 51% having multiple teeth damaged in half the kids. Did your dentist mention this huge increase in cosmetic damage has shot dental incomes past doctors working less hours. Must have been a oversight. Yes and it is also makes it look like they care when 80% refuse to treat medicaid dental kids. Just not much money in doing the right thing so most get no care. The Burt 2007 study showed clearly increasing cavities after 50 years of fluoridation because poor nutrition and no dentists to treat the poor kids. Soda and chips are the formula for cavities and poor health. Calcium,magnesium vitamin d etc make health teeth but fluoride destroys them. From the 40's blacks have been shown damaged double of whites by fluoride so the CDC knows the truth would kill their pet project and make them look evil. How do you back away from damage for all and no benefit. Lie more is the CDC way. Alamo Heights Tx just voted to reject fluoridation after they did the research. Poughkeepsie NY asked lots of questions to the health department and chemical suppliers and they refused to answer. They ended 5 decades of fluoridation. I see a pattern. Research,you will also. "

    Jim Schultz wrote on Sep 11, 2008 8:14 PM:

    " The product used is cheap because it is from smokestack pollution scrubbers and industry is paid for something illegal to put in the environment by the EPA. Lawsuits in the 60's for fluoride airborn pollution were greater then for all other of the top 20 pollutants. This is some evil toxins. Also unmentioned to the public is it contains 20 plus deadly contaminates with arsenic and lead topping the list butr most radioactive as the mines also produce Uranium. Florida has 6 or 7 uranium recovery units until about 1993 when they closed when the price fell. Now the radioactive blend is left in the products unmentioned to the public. H2SiF6 makes water much more corrosive to leach lead from brass and solder in homes.Maas 2007 --chlorine and even more so chloramine supercharge leaching so expensive corrosion control chemicals must be added to reduce this evil side effect and reduce damage to plant equipment. It destroys pumps,pipes and just everything. 19 of the EPA unions want an immediate halt and fraud investigations by congress. Did your health department mention that. See nteu280.org to read 8 fluoride position papers. See Yoder K.M. at pubmed.com and discover most dentists have no knowledge of current fluoride science. They put us all at risk by being uninformed. Protect yourself with Knowledge. "

    Jim Schultz wrote on Sep 11, 2008 7:59 PM:

    " You can see both sides of the issue and government documents at fluoridealert.org. Most are not aware that the H2SiF6 has never been tested by any government agency even once chronic use for health,safety or even benefit. Also the FDA has never approved or even reviewed any ingested fluoride ever. It is sort of grandfathered in for use prior to 1938 unmentioned that use was as rat poison. This was discover by congressman John Kelly NJ after FDA lie for two years.
    No current research shows ingested fluoride of value. The CDC and ADA both know benefit is topical if it exists at all. "


    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Onalaska Life.

     Post a comment »

    (optional)
       
    Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
    About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
    Copyright © 2006 The Onalaska Life. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.