Newspaper Ads from the 7 Rivers Region Classifieds from the 7 Rivers Region Jobs in the 7 Rivers Region Cars in the 7 Rivers Region Homes for Sale in the 7 Rivers Region Rental PRoperties in the 7 Rivers Region & Rivers Region Website Directory Shopping in the 7 Rivers Region
 SPONSOR LINKS
spacer

PRINT ADS

spacer
 Home > Opinion > Story

Published - Wednesday, June 11, 2008

POST COMMENT | READ COMMENTS (No comments posted.)

EDITORIAL: Maintaining hyper-mobility won’t come cheap

   Advertisement   
Advertise Info. Website Directory
.
It was no fun paying high prices for gas during the Memorial Day Weekend (it was $3.929 per gallon Monday), but Americans are finally being confronted with the high cost of mobility. Since 1974, the number of vehicle miles driven in Wisconsin has outpaced its population by a factor of five, and it’s becoming clear that such mobility can’t be sustained, either economically or environmentally.

The policy prescriptions for maintaining hyper-mobility all have limitations, including:

  • DOMESTIC OIL: There are untapped U.S. reserves, perhaps enough to sustain 50 to 60 more years of current consumption. Unfortunately, they’re trapped in places that are hard to extract, ecologically sensitive or ruin somebody’s seascape. And when that oil is gone, what then?

  • ETHANOL: Even as corn-based ethanol finally begins to eke out some BTU gains, it’s still unclear how much land is required to grow all the plant-based fuel our cars require and how much food is sacrificed in the process. Ethanol wouldn’t exist without government subsidies, which should give policymakers a clue about its viability as an alternative energy source.

  • WIND: It’s clean and renewable, but few people want a wind turbine in their neighborhood. Besides, there’s not nearly enough wind power to produce the electricity needed to power a hybrid automobile fleet (the same is true with solar power).

  • NUCLEAR: It doesn’t generate greenhouse gasses, but uranium, like oil, is a finite resource. Uranium also generates toxic waste, and Congress can’t figure out a way to permanently store it.

  • HYDROGEN FUEL CELLS: Perhaps this is the best long-term solution, but there is still the challenge of making, storing and distributing hydrogen on a large scale.

    Here’s the reality: A society with 200 million passenger vehicles that average 15,000 miles per year will consume massive amounts of natural resources, and it doesn’t matter whether those resources are animal, mineral or vegetable.

    The only way to lower transportation costs is to live closer to our places of employment, cut back on discretionary miles and operate more energy efficient vehicles. There are no cheap and easy answers to keep all those cars on the road.
    .
  •    Advertisement   
     Tell us what you think...

     Comments »


    The comments above are from readers. In no way do they represent the views of the Onalaska Life.

     Post a comment »

    (optional)
       
    Thank you for your comments! Once your comments are approved, they will appear on the site.
    About Us | Advertise Online | Contact Us | Disclaimer | F.A.Q. | Privacy Policy | Requests | RSS | Webmaster | Website Directory
    Copyright © 2006 The Onalaska Life. All rights reserved.
    Material from this site may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed. A Lee Enterprises subsidiary.